Analisis Disparitas Putusan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Kurir Narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Barru Tinjauan Yuridis dan Normatif

Penulis

  • Awaluddin Saputra Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
  • Sunardi Purwanda Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
  • Elvi Susanti Syam Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
  • Bakhtiar Tijjang Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
  • Muh Sabir Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1410

Kata Kunci:

Difference, Decision, Courier, Drugs

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze disparities in sentencing for drug couriers and their impact on the sense of justice for both the permit issuer and the public. Disparities in sentencing in drug cases often raise questions about fairness in law enforcement, particularly when defendants are charged under the same article but receive different sentences. This study identifies the legal and non-legal factors influencing these disparities. This study uses a normative approach with legal analysis through regulatory and case studies. The results show that disparities in outcomes not only affect the sense of justice for the fraudsters but also create dissatisfaction in the community, particularly among the fraudsters' families. Factors influencing these disparities in sentencing include provisions in Law No. 35/2009 concerning Narcotics as well as non-legal considerations such as family support and pardons.

Referensi

Ainuddin. (2019). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Lengkap. Mataram: Pustaka Bangsa.

Aria Zurnetti, Fitri Wahyuni & Sitti Rahmah. (2021). Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali.

Aria Zurnetti, Fitri Wahyuni & Sitti Rahmah. 2021. Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali.

Asep N. Mulyana. (2022). Hukum Pidana Militer. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Didik Endro Purwoleksono. (2012). Hukum Acara Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Pfress.

Eddy. OS Hiariej. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma.

Hamsir. (2020). Hukum Pidana Khusus. Lhokseumawe: Sefa Bumi Persada.

Ishaq. (2018). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ishaq. 2017. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Juliardi, B., Runtunuwu, Y. B., Musthofa, M. H., TL, A. D., Asriyani, A., Hazmi, R. M., ... & Samara, M. R. 2023. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Padang: Gita Lentera.

Lukman Hakim. (2020). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Buku Ajar bagi Mahasiswa. Yogyakarta: Deepublish

M Haryanto. (2017).Tuntutan Bebas dalam perkara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

M. Khoirur Rofiq. (2022). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Semarang: Rafi Sarana Perkasa.

Muhaimin. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

Muhammad Hattta. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Penyalagunaan Narkotika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muliadi & Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung:

Nur Alam Rachim & Aris Munandar. (2023). Aspek Hukum Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Bojonegoro: Karya Bakti Makmur.

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2025-12-12

Cara Mengutip

Saputra, A., Purwanda, S., Syam, E. S., Tijjang, B. ., & Sabir, M. (2025). Analisis Disparitas Putusan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Kurir Narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Barru Tinjauan Yuridis dan Normatif. JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM, 19(01), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1410