Dilema Efisiensi Pelayanan dan Keamanan Nasional: Analisis Kerentanan Autogate terhadap Deteksi Dini Pelanggaran dan Tindak Pidana Keimigrasian di Tempat Pemeriksaan Imigrasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i02.1531Kata Kunci:
Autogate, Human Profiling, Border Security, Immigration Crimes, BiometricsAbstrak
The digital transformation of immigration services in Indonesia is marked by the implementation of Autogate technology as an effort to modernize border inspections at various strategic Immigration Checkpoints (TPI). However, the efficiency offered by this automation triggers a dilemma between service speed and the sharpness of national security oversight. This study aims to analyze the vulnerability of the Autogate system toward the early detection of immigration violations and its effectiveness in replacing the human profiling function. Using a qualitative research method with a normative-juridical approach, secondary data were analyzed descriptively-analytically through content analysis techniques. The results show that: (1) Autogate is effective for technical-administrative biometric verification but has not been able to replace the intuitive dimension of human profiling in detecting behavioral anomalies; (2) There are vulnerability points in the sensitivity of biometric sensors, latency in synchronization of prevention and deterrence data (cekal), and potential impersonation modes due to the system's similarity threshold; (3) Operational constraints such as system failures (down system) and limited physical verification without human interaction reduce the ability of Immigration Officers to take immediate action against indications of transnational crimes. This study concludes that ideal border security requires a hybrid oversight model that integrates machine efficiency with the sharpness of human intelligence analysis to maintain border sovereignty towards Indonesia Emas 2045.
Referensi
Anindito R Wiraputra dan Nilam Rizky Anugerah. “Kontradiktif Implementasi Autogate Terhadap Cap Keimigrasian.” Photosynthetica 2, no. 1 (2018).
Departemen Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat. “Laporan Perdagangan Manusia Tahun 2023 - .” US Department of State, 2023. https://2021-2025.state.gov/reports/2023-trafficking-in-persons-report/.
Direktorat Jenderal Imigrasi. “Kini WNA Sudah Bisa Gunakan Autogate Imigrasi Di Bandara Ngurah Rai – .” Direktorat Jenderal Imigrasi, 2019. https://www.imigrasi.go.id/berita/2019/08/01/kini-wna-sudah-bisa-gunakan-autogate-imigrasi-di-bandara-ngurah-rai.
Fadhiil Fauzi Jayadita, Muhammad, Muhammad Thoriq Rabbani, Arya Dewa Adinata, and Sarinah Sihombing. “Analisis Pengaruh Autogate, Self Check-In Dan Sistem Keamanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan.” Jurnal Siber Transportasi Dan Logistik 1, no. 3 (2023). doi:10.38035/jstl.v1i3.126.
Kemenimipas. Rencana Strategis Kementrian Imigrasi Dan Permasyarakatan 2025-1019. Banggai Imigrasi, 2025. https://banggai.imigrasi.go.id/attachments/Renstra_Kementerian_Imigrasi_dan_Pemsyarakatan_2025.pdf.
Khalis, Yumna Khalikah, Budi Setiyanto, and Diana Lukitasari. “FAKTOR TINDAK PIDANA OVERSTAY WNA PADA KANTOR IMIGRASI KELAS I TPI SURAKARTA.” Recidive?: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 9, no. 3 (2020). doi:10.20961/recidive.v9i3.47407.
Nursanto, Gunawan Ari, Isidorus Anung Prabadhi, Besse Hartati, Wilonotmo Wilonotmo, and Nurul Maharani Piranti. “Enhancing Public Wellbeing Through Autogate at Soekarno-Hatta International Airports.” Return?: Study of Management, Economic and Bussines 3, no. 2 (2024). doi:10.57096/return.v3i2.214.
Putra, Fikri Madani Tara, Feby Putri Kusumaningdewi, and Rahma Aishanda. “Efektifitas Autogate Sebagai Pondasi Pelayanan Keimigrasian Masa Depan.” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 12 (2022). doi:10.54371/jiip.v5i12.1197.
Qinthara Fatharani, Alifine, Dara Gautama Meilina, and A. Gede Raka Arta Yoga. “Penggunaan Autogate Di Tempat Pemeriksaan Imigrasi Bandar Udara Internasional Soekarno-Hatta.” Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya 7, no. 4 (2021). doi:10.32884/ideas.v7i4.506.











