Kajian Filsafat Hukum Mengenai Pembatasan Waktu Kuasa Jual Tanpa Dasar Hukum Formal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i02.1571Kata Kunci:
Legal Philosophy, Time Limitation, Power of Attorney to Sell.Abstrak
The power of attorney to sell in civil law is rooted in the principle of freedom of contract as stipulated in Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code. However, inpractice, powers of attorney to sell are often made absolute, irrevocable, and without a time limit, and are even attached to loan agreements as security for debt repayment. Such practices give rise to juridical and philosophical issues because they shift the essence of a power of attorney from representation into a disguised transfer of rights, and potentially cause injustice to the grantor of the power. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, through various decisions, has consistently rejected the validity of absolute powers of attorney, particularly those used as debt security, and has affirmed that a power of attorney to sell cannot serve as a basis for the transfer of land rights. This research employs a normative legal research method with philosophical, conceptual, and statutory approaches. The study focuses on the philosophical legitimacy of imposing a time limitation on powers of attorney to sell in notarial practice and land administration, despite the absence of explicit regulation in the Civil Code or land law regulations. The findings show that limiting the duration of a power of attorney to sell has strong philosophical legitimacy based on the theories of legal certainty, justice, and utility as articulated by Hans Kelsen, Gustav Radbruch, Aristotle, John Rawls, Jeremy Bentham, and John Stuart Mill. The decisions of the Supreme Court are consistent with these legal philosophical values, as they function as corrective instruments to prevent circumvention of the law and to protect weaker parties. Therefore, the imposition of a time limitation on a power of attorney to sell can be philosophically and juridically justified as an effort to maintain a balance of rights and obligations between the parties, even though it lacks an explicit written normative basis.
Referensi
BUKU
Hadjon, Philipus M dan Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. 2024. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah
Mada University Press.
Irwansyah. 2024. Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik PenulisanArtikel. Yogyakarta:
Mirra Buana Media.
Kelsen, Hans. 2022. Teori Hukum Murni. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Marzuki, P.M. 2011. Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Kencana. Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2010. Hukum Acara Perdata. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Radbruch, Gustav. Legal Philosophy. Translated by Kurt Wilk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1950.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
Soekanto, Soerjono. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Subekti, R. 2005. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
JURNAL
Fernando, dan Firman Muntaqo. “Pencantuman Klausula Kuasa Menjual Objek Hak
Tanggungan Pada Perjanjian Kredit Pembelian Satuan Rumah Susun.” Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 12, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v12i1.2866.
Helmi, Nurul, Teuku Afrizal, dan Fatahillah. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Kuasa Menjual
Mutlak Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 4, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v4i1.4044
Prayoga, Harry Dwicha. “Penggunaan Surat Kuasa Menjual Pada Objek Jaminan Yang
Dibebani Hak Tanggungan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan.” Officium Notarium 2, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss2.art2
Wati, Endang Eko dan Fetri Fatorina. 2021. Kuasa Menjual JaminanPadaPembiayaan Akad
Murabahah Bil Wakalah (Studi Analisis PerkaraNomor : 0001/Pdt.GS/2020/PA.Pwt). At-Turost : Jurnal of Islamic Studies. Volume8No. 01.
Wibowo, Ari Tri dan Endang Eko Wati. 2022. Surat Kuasa Menjual dalamAkadPembiayaan
Perbankan Syariah dan Dampaknya Terhadap Eksekusi JaminanBenda Tidak Bergerak. Jurnal Iqtisad. Volume 9 No. 1.
INTERNET
https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/yurisprudensi-larangan-surat- kuasa-mutlak-dalam-jual-beli-0wj
PUTUSAN PENGADILAN
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2584 K/Pdt/1986.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2660 K/Pdt/1987.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1991 K/Pdt/1994.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1794 K/Pdt/2004.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3166 K/Pdt/2015.











