Perbandingan Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Antara Negara Indonesia dan Negara Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1405Kata Kunci:
Legal comparison, administrative law, Indonesia, Malaysia, civil law, common law, digitalization, administrative disputes.Abstrak
This research aims to analyze and compare the administrative dispute resolution systems in Indonesia and Malaysia, highlighting the differences in legal systems, institutional structures, and dispute resolution mechanisms in each country. Indonesia adopts a civil law system, relying on the Administrative Court (PTUN) as a specialized institution for resolving administrative disputes. Meanwhile, Malaysia follows a common law system, utilizing the judicial review mechanism through the High Court, without a dedicated administrative court. The findings of the study show that Indonesia has a more formal and structured system, while Malaysia is more flexible but lacks procedural certainty. In terms of digitalization, Indonesia is still in the process of strengthening its legal and technological infrastructure, while Malaysia has already implemented e-government. This study offers recommendations for both countries to adopt best practices in administrative dispute resolution.
Referensi
Ade Maman Suherman, Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004), hlm. 10–11.
Andi Hamzah, 2014, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Kedelapan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2006). Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Bachsan Mustafa, 2003. Sistem Hukum Indonesia Terpadu. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, hlm. 5–6.
Craig, P.P. (2016). Administrative Law (8th ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Reformasi Pelayanan Publik di Negara Berkembang dan Negara Maju, Vol. 19 No. 2 Oktober 2022, hlm. 22
Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
Harding, Andrew. (2012). The Constitution of Malaysia: A Contextual Analysis. Hart Publishing.
Helmi. (2018). Perlindungan Hak-Hak Warga Negara dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(2), hkm 193
J.B. Daliyo, 1992, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Johny ibrahim, Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia, Surabaya, 2005, Hlm. 52.
Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v. Alam Maritim (M) Sdn. Bhd [2014] 5 MLJ 123.
Maimoonah Mohamed. (2017). Judicial Review in Malaysia: Scope and Limitations, Malayan Law Journal, Vol. 3.
Maulidiah, S. (2020). Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pengelolaan Pertambangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan dan Ke-PPAT-an, 1(1),hmm 63.
Muchsin, H., 2005, Ikhtisar Hukum Indonesia, Setelah Perubahan Keempat UUD 1945 Dan Pemilihan Presiden Secara Langsung, Badan Penerbit Iblam, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta.
Najih, Mokhammad, dan Soimin, 2012, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Sejarah, Konsep Tata Hukum & Politik Hukum Indonesia, Setara Press, Malang.
Ridwan HR. (2020). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Rama Chandran v. The Industrial Court of Malaysia [1997] 1 MLJ 145.
R Rama Chandran v. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri [1986] 1 MLJ 108.
PANDUAN PENULISAN JURNAL 
TUTORIAL REGISTRASI DAN SUBMIT JURNAL 
